What is the Difference Between Stabilizing and Balancing Selection?
🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚The main difference between stabilizing and balancing selection lies in their effects on genetic diversity and the types of traits they act upon.
Stabilizing selection:
- Favors average phenotypes within a population, eliminating both extreme phenotypes.
- Applies to a phenotypic trait.
- Results in a more uniform population with decreased genetic variation.
- Occurs when the population stabilizes on a particular trait value.
Balancing selection:
- Maintains advantageous genetic diversity within populations.
- Applies to a gene locus.
- Favors multiple alleles and non-uniform populations.
- Contributes to increased genetic diversity via two key mechanisms: heterozygote advantage and frequency-dependent selection.
In summary, stabilizing selection favors average phenotypes and leads to a more uniform population with less genetic diversity, while balancing selection maintains genetic diversity by favoring multiple alleles and non-uniform populations.
Comparative Table: Stabilizing vs Balancing Selection
The key difference between stabilizing and balancing selection lies in their effect on genetic diversity within a population. Stabilizing selection favors average phenotypes and eliminates extreme phenotypes, resulting in a uniform population and decreased genetic diversity. In contrast, balancing selection maintains genetic diversity by keeping multiple alleles of a gene within a population. Here is a table summarizing the differences between stabilizing and balancing selection:
Feature | Stabilizing Selection | Balancing Selection |
---|---|---|
Definition | A type of natural selection that favors average phenotypes and eliminates extreme phenotypes. | Several selective processes that maintain advantageous genetic diversity. |
Effect on Phenotypes | Eliminates both extremes of phenotypes, resulting in a uniform population. | Maintains multiple alleles of a gene within a population, contributing to increased genetic diversity. |
Mechanisms | Does not maintain multiple alleles of a gene. | Contributes to increased genetic diversity via two key mechanisms: heterozygote advantage and frequency-dependent selection. |
Examples | A population of mice with brown fur would be favored in a forest environment, eliminating other shades of fur. | A heterozygote advantage example: a population of animals with two different alleles for a specific trait, such as the interbreedingischer coat color experiment in rabbits. |
In summary, stabilizing selection favors average phenotypes and eliminates extreme phenotypes, while balancing selection maintains genetic diversity by keeping multiple alleles of a gene within a population. Both types of selection contribute to the balance and stability of populations, but they have different effects on genetic diversity.
- Disruptive Selection vs Stabilizing Selection
- Directional vs Disruptive Selection
- Balance vs Stability
- Alignment vs Balancing
- Spatial Sorting vs Natural Selection
- Natural Selection vs Sexual Selection
- Natural Selection vs Artificial Selection
- Natural Selection vs Genetic Drift
- Natural Selection vs Evolution
- Fixation vs Stabilization
- GMO vs Selective Breeding
- Selective Breeding vs Genetic Engineering
- Transgenesis vs Selective Breeding
- Bubble Sort vs Selection Sort
- Balanced vs Unbalanced
- Assortative vs Disassortative Mating
- Natural Selection vs Adaptation
- Artificial Selection vs Genetic Engineering
- Specificity vs Selectivity